Why Platform Value Matters More Than AUM in Real Estate

AUM is overrated. The real game is platform value.
Harder to measure, but it’s what drives strategy.

Our two cents...

1. Blackstone stands alone.
$339B in AUM, $279B in fee-AUM, premium multiple.
A category of one.

2. Margins matter.
JLL’s LaSalle runs at ~21% margin.
Colliers’ Harrison Street-driven platform at ~42%.
As AUM scales, margins expand, which makes allocators like Harrison Street and Blackstone powerful.

3. Fee-generating AUM > AUM.
Just look at Brookfield’s relative decline.
Private credit gets a lot of attention but core debt doesn't create much platform value.

4. Valuations swing.
Hodes Weill: 13x–20x earnings for platforms.
Why the gap? Durable, high-yielding funds command premiums.

5. Potential arbitrage?
CBRE IM: ~$5B value (~9% of enterprise).
Colliers IM: ~$4.5B (~40%).
Similar business, wildly different weightings.

How could they close the gap?

CBRE should:
-- Grow AUM immediately
-- Buy bolt-on managers
-- Diversify into infrastructure
-- Otherwise sell or IPO the investment management business

Colliers should:
-- Guard margins
-- Brand as a mini-Blackstone.

Sun Life should:
-- Leverage back door control of BGO
-- Sell to CBRE

Platform value shapes appetite.
Appetite shapes markets.
That’s why we follow the dollars.

Want to dig deeper? DM us to explore our upcoming FastTrack cohort.

Topics

COMMENTS

Scroll